«... got one, thnx!» by mstep
on 09 Aug'11 21:20 inNdef folly
1 2 3 4 5
Ndef(\a, { Limiter.ar(GVerb.ar(SinOsc.ar(Ndef(\d), 0, Ndef(\b), Ndef(\c)) )) }); Ndef(\b, { LFDNoise0.ar(500)}); Ndef(\c, { LFDNoise1.ar(10)}); Ndef(\d, { LFDNoise3.ar(SinOsc.kr(3, 0, 1000, 300), 200, 200)}); Ndef(\a).play;
descendants
full graph
reception
Love you code...I was playing with it and then it I came in to this...This is what I Call lovley Birds... Ndef(\a, { Limiter.ar(GVerb.ar(SinOsc.ar(Ndef(\d), 0, Ndef(\b), Ndef(\c)))) }); Ndef(\b, { LFDNoise0.ar(100.5/2)}); Ndef(\c, { LFDNoise1.ar(10.1)}); Ndef(\d, { LFDNoise3.ar(LFPulse.kr([5, 1]!2, mul: 15, add:20), 1000/2, 720)}); Ndef(\a).play;
I tried to tralet the code in a simple {}.play but it dosent work the same as the Ndef...
play{ Limiter.ar(GVerb.ar(SinOsc.ar(LFDNoise3.ar(LFPulse.kr([5, 1],mul: 15, add:20).sum, 1000/2, 720), 0, LFDNoise0.ar(100.5/2), LFDNoise1.ar(10.1)))) }... Do you know why dosent sound the same even when is the same code except for the !2...I have a lot a people waiting for tis answer....Cheers!!... Sebastian.
Sorry, the coment above is a mess....Goes something like this: Love your code...I was playing with it and then I came to this...This is what I Call lovely Birds... Ndef(\a, { Limiter.ar(GVerb.ar(SinOsc.ar(Ndef(\d), 0, Ndef(\b), Ndef(\c)))) }); Ndef(\b, { LFDNoise0.ar(100.5/2)}); Ndef(\c, { LFDNoise1.ar(10.1)}); Ndef(\d, { LFDNoise3.ar(LFPulse.kr([5, 1]!2, mul: 15, add:20), 1000/2, 720)}); Ndef(\a).play;
I tried to translate the code into a simple {}.play...
play{ Limiter.ar(GVerb.ar(SinOsc.ar(LFDNoise3.ar(LFPulse.kr([5, 1],mul: 15, add:20).sum, 1000/2, 720), 0, LFDNoise0.ar(100.5/2), LFDNoise1.ar(10.1)))) }... but it dosen't sound the smae as the Ndef above...Do you know why it dosent', even when it's the same code except for the !2...Cheers!!... Sebastian.